Comparison of TOPSIS and SMARTER Methods in Selecting Delivery Services
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57152/ijatis.v1i1.1139Keywords:
Delivery Services, Freight Forwarding Services, Sensitivity, SMARTER, TOPSISAbstract
The rapid growth of the e-commerce world has propelled the demand for freight forwarding services, a pivotal component in maintaining the smooth flow of this business. Major companies like JNE, TIKI, Kantor Pos Indonesia, SiCepat, and J&T Express are involved. However, despite this convenience, various challenges often accompany the shipping process. Some of these include delayed deliveries, lost or damaged items, or even misdeliveries to the wrong customers. This presents a dilemma for leading e-commerce companies in selecting the most suitable delivery service partner. Hence, a decision support model is necessary in choosing a freight forwarding service. This study will outline comparison methods based on both Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique Exploiting Ranks (SMARTER). The proposed methods have strong relevance to the rapid growth of the e-commerce world. This research emphasizes the importance of selecting freight forwarding services in maintaining the smooth operation of e-commerce businesses. The results of this study have obtained ranking results from the final value of each method. The first place in the TOPSIS method with a value of 0.7033 at sensitivity 3 and the lowest in the SMARTER method with a value of 0.1303 at the first sensitivity, and at the second sensitivity, all methods have the same value of 0.2. The conclusion is that TOPSIS is the best method compared to the SMARTER method as a decision support for the selection of freight forwarding services.
References
D. Kellner, Technology and Democracy: Toward A Critical Theory of Digital Technologies, Technopolitics, and Technocapitalism. 2021.
S. Parengkuan and N. Nurhasanah, “ANALISIS KOMPARATIF PREFERENSI KONSUMEN DALAM BELANJA ONLINE.”
F. Radhia and V. U. Tjhin, “Analyzing the continuous use intention of online consumer on leading online shopping platform,” J Theor Appl Inf Technol, vol. 99, no. 11, pp. 2632–2647, 2021.
A. Putri and S. Wasiyanti, “Pemilihan Jasa Pengiriman Barang Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW),” SATIN –Sains dan Teknologi Informasi, vol. 6, no. 1, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.sar.ac.id/index.php/satin
L. Septian Putri and N. Hidayat, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Mitra Jasa Pengiriman Barang menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW)-Technique for Other Reference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) di Kota Malang,” 2018. [Online]. Available: http://j-ptiik.ub.ac.id
A. Abdullah, “Daya Saing Ott (Over the Top) E-Commerce Indonesia Dalam Menghadapi Persaingan Global,” LABATILA: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Islam, vol. 3, no. 01, pp. 25–47, 2019.
S. Wasiyanti and A. Putri, “Pemilihan Jasa Pengiriman Barang Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW),” SATIN-Sains dan Teknologi Informasi, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 10–19, 2020.
M. U. H. Uzir et al., “The effects of service quality, perceived value and trust in home delivery service personnel on customer satisfaction: Evidence from a developing country,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, vol. 63, p. 102721, 2021.
I. Mutmainah and Y. Yunita, “Penerapan Metode Topsis Dalam Pemilihan Jasa Ekspedisi,” Jurnal Sisfokom (Sistem Informasi dan Komputer), vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 86–92, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.32736/sisfokom.v10i1.1028.
R. Risnawati and N. Manurung, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN DALAM PENENTUAN MITRA JASA PENGIRIMAN BARANG TERBAIK DI KOTA KISARAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE TOPSIS,” JURTEKSI (Jurnal Teknologi dan Sistem Informasi), vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 133–138, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.33330/jurteksi.v5i2.357.
S. Kabiri, H. Kalbkhani, T. Lotfollahzadeh, M. G. Shayesteh, and V. Solouk, “Technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution based predictive handoff for heterogeneous networks,” IET Communications, vol. 10, no. 13, pp. 1682–1690, 2016.
M. Bertolini, G. Esposito, and G. Romagnoli, “A TOPSIS-based approach for the best match between manufacturing technologies and product specifications,” Expert Syst Appl, vol. 159, p. 113610, 2020.
W. E. Sari, M. B, and S. Rani, “Perbandingan Metode SAW dan Topsis pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Penerima Beasiswa,” Jurnal Sisfokom (Sistem Informasi dan Komputer), vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 52–58, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.32736/sisfokom.v10i1.1027.
W. Yusnaeni and R. Ningsih, “Analisa Perbandingan Metode Topsis, SAW dan WP Melalui Uji Sensitifitas Supplier Terbaik,” JURNAL INFORMATIKA, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 9–17, 2019, [Online]. Available: http://ejournal.bsi.ac.id/ejurnal/index.php/ji/article/view/4399
E. Daniati and H. Utama, Clustering K Means for Criteria Weighting With Improvement Result of Alternative Decisions Using SAW and TOPSIS. 2019.
S. Maesyaroh, “ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN METODE AHP DAN TOPSIS DALAM PEMILIHAN ASISTEN LABORATORIUM DI FKOM UNIKU,” JURBAL NUANSA INFORMATIKA, vol. 14, 2020.
F. R. Darmawan, E. L. Amalia, and U. D. Rosiani, “Penerapan Metode Topsis pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan untuk Kota yang Menerapkan Pembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar yang di Sebabkan Wabah Corona,” Jurnal Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi (Justin), vol. 9, no. 2, p. 250, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.26418/justin.v9i2.43896.
N. Silalahi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Dosen Berprestasi Menggunakan Metode SMARTER Pada Universitas Budi Darma,” Bulletin of Information Technology (BIT), vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 50–57, 2020.
A. Annisah, B. Nadeak, R. Syahputra, and D. P. Utomo, “Penerapan Metode SMARTER Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Merchandise Display Terbaik (Studi Kasus: PT. Pasar Swalayan Maju Bersama),” KOMIK (Konferensi Nasional Teknologi Informasi dan Komputer), vol. 4, no. 1, 2020.
S. Syahidatul Helma, U. H. Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau Jl Soebrantas Km, and P. Pekanbaru -Riau, “Puzzle Research Data Technology (Predatech), Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan,” 2019.
R. Hafsarah Maharrani, P. Diantono Abda, and H. Dwi Hastuti, “Penerapan Metode SMARTER pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Lahan Kayu Putih,” vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 178–188, 2023, doi: 10.30865/mib.v7i1.5293.
A. Elia, A. Fadilah, M. Fitriani, and P. Suryani, “Comparison of SMART, SMARTER AND TOPSIS Methods in Selection Location of Serba Murah Store Pulau Kijang,” vol. 1, pp. 170–176, 2021.
A. Yaqin, A. Dahlan, T. Hidayat, and R. M. Putra, “Decision Support System for Boarding house Search Using Topsis Algorithm,” 2019.
V. M. M. Siregar, S. Sonang, A. T. Purba, H. Sugara, and N. F. Siagian, “Implementation of TOPSIS Algorithm for Selection of Prominent Student Class,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing, 2021, p. 012038.
R. Adelina Hutasoit and A. Wanto, “KOMIK (Konferensi Nasional Teknologi Informasi dan Komputer) ANALISA PEMILIHAN BARISTA DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE TOPSIS (STUDI KASUS: MO COFFEE),” KOMIK (Konferensi Nasional Teknologi Informasi dan Komputer) KOMIK (Konferensi Nasional Teknologi Informasi dan Komputer) , vol. 2, Nomor 1, 2018, [Online]. Available: http://ejurnal.stmik-budidarma.ac.id/index.php/komik
S. Riahi, N. Fathianpour, and S. Hassan Tabatabaei, “Improving the Accuracy of Detecting and Ranking Favorable Porphyry Copper prospects in the East of Sarcheshmeh Copper Mine region using a Two-step Sequential Fuzzy - Fuzzy TOPSIS Integration Approach,” Journal of Asian Earth Sciences: X, p. 100166, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jaesx.2023.100166.
M. J. Huang, “A novel design research based on fuzzy Kano-TOPSIS exploring the local culture on innovative campus product,” in Proceedings - 2020 13th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design, ISCID 2020, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., Dec. 2020, pp. 145–148. doi: 10.1109/ISCID51228.2020.00039.
A. K. M. Amanat Ullah, M. T. Mahtab, and M. G. R. Alam, “Efficient Portfolio Management using TOPSIS and Ada-Boost,” in 2020 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Computer Science and Data Engineering, CSDE 2020, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., Dec. 2020. doi: 10.1109/CSDE50874.2020.9411530.
I. Ramadhan, R. Adha, R. Joko Musridho, and E. Firmansyah, “Penerapan Algoritma TOPSIS, MOORA, dan SMARTER untuk Menentukan Kualittas Getah Karet,” MALCOM: Indonesian Journal of Machine Learning and Computer Science, vol. 2, pp. 1–9, 2022.
J. Wi?ckowski and W. Sa?abun, “Sensitivity analysis approaches in multi-criteria decision analysis: A systematic review,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 148. Elsevier Ltd, Nov. 01, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110915.
U. Soleha, M. Widyastuti, and P. Studi Sistem Informasi Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi, “Perbandingan Algoritma Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), SMARTER, dan MOORA dalam Penentuan Bidang Keahlian Siswa,” 2021.
K. N. A. Nur, S. R. , Andani, and P. Poningsih, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Operator Seluler Menggunakan Metode Multi-Objective Optimization on the Basis of Ratio Analysis (Moora),” KOMIK (Konferensi Nasional Teknologi Informasi dan Komputer), vol. 2(1), 2018.
