Determining Zakat Recipients Using Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique with Analytic Hierarchy Process Eigen Preference
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57152/ijatis.v2i1.1771Keywords:
Analytic Hierarchy Process, Mustahiq, Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique, ZakatAbstract
Paying zakat for Muslims is an obligation to alleviate the burden of recipients. However, difficulties arise in determining the right individuals for zakat distribution because each type of mustahiq or zakat recipient can seem similar to one and another therefore become hard distinguish. This research aims to enhance accuracy using a Decision Support System (DSS) with criteria like Number of Dependents, Income, Occupation, Home Ownership, Marital Status, House Walls, House Floors, and House Roof. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method simplifies unstructured problems into a hierarchy, and the Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique (SMART) offers flexibility in analysis. Decision outcomes are rankings with the highest scores, ordering those most deserving of zakat. Weighting results highlight Number of Dependents with the highest weight at 0.335 for determining zakat recipients. Based on ranking, alternative A1 secures the top position with a score of 0.077.
References
R. Arianto, N. Manurung, and Akmal, “DSS: Recommendations For Zakat Recipients For Mustahiq At The National Zakat Amil Body With TOPSIS,” pp. 575–582, 2022.
A. Iskandar and K. Aqbar, “Zakat Distribution Policy of Umar Bin Khattab and Covid-19 Crisis,” J. Econ. Bus. Islam, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 160–178, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://journal.iain-manado.ac.id/index.php/TJEBI/article/view/1184
N. F. Harun and A. Ab Rahman, “Zakah Distribution for The Purpose of Capital Assistance at Zakah Institutions in Malaysia: An Exploratory Study,” Malaysian J. Soc. Sci. Humanit., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 298–306, 2021, doi: 10.47405/mjssh.v6i1.630.
M. B. Mustofa, Layla Handayani, and Siti Wuryan, “Organizational Communication Strategy at BAZNAS Institution in Raising Zakat Funds in Bandar Lampung City,” J. Int. Dakwah Commun., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 90–96, 2023, doi: 10.55849/jidc.v3i2.222.
S. A. Bin-Nashwan, H. Abdul-Jabbar, and S. A. Aziz, “Do enforcement, religiosity and peer influence Zakah compliance behavior?,” Int. J. Financ. Res., vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 42–53, 2019, doi: 10.5430/ijfr.v10n6p42.
Fahmi Ali Hudaefi and Irfan Syauqi Beik, “How does zakat institution respond to fintech? evidence from BAZNAS, Indonesia,” Issues, no. 2, pp. 2672–7471, 2020.
I. Subchi, M. Rosyadi, D. Oktavianto, S. Masruroh, T. Rohmatin, and A. K, “Implementation Method of Weighted Product (WP) Determining The Amount of Distribution Zakat Funds to Mustahik,” vol. 4, 2020, doi: 10.4108/eai.2-10-2018.2295535.
H. Hanim and Jefril Rahmadoni, “Determination Of Lecturer Reception Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP),” vol. 1, pp. 136–141, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.37385/jaets.v1i2.100.
I. Canco, D. Kruja, and T. Iancu, “Ahp, a reliable method for quality decision making: A case study in business,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 24, pp. 1–14, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su132413932.
V. Rosalina, W. Agustiawan, and A. Purnamasari, “Decision Support System for Determining the Best Customer Using the Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique (SMART),” Int. J. Inf. Technol. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 58–65, 2023, doi: 10.58776/ijitcsa.v1i1.8.
O. Sihombing et al., “Determining Outstanding Employee Using Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique Method,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1230, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1230/1/012076.
N. Sari, N. Novriyenni, and T. R. Pasaribu, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerima Zakat Menggunakan Metode Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique (SMART) (STUDI KASUS: Kantor Baznas Kota Binjai),” J. Sist. Inf. Kaputama, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 245–255, 2022, doi: 10.59697/jsik.v6i2.177.
M. Parida and Merina, “Sistem Pendukung Pengambilan Keputusan Seleksi Penerimaan Beras (Raskin) Menggunakan Metode Ahp,” J. Inf. Dan Komput., vol. 7, no. 2, p. 2019, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.35959/jik.v7i2.134.
A. Rafiq, B. Santoso, and S. Kacung, “Implementasi Metode AHP dan SMART untuk Penentuan Keputusan Calon Penerima Zakat Produktif: Implementation of AHP and SMART Methods for Productive Zakat Recipient Candidate Decisions,” MALCOM Indones. J. Mach. Learn. Comput. Sci., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1087–1095, 2024.
F. Rizki and Samsudin, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pendistribusian Zakat Menggunakan Metode Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique (SMART) dan Simple Additive Weighting (SAW),” Inf. (Jurnal Inform. dan Sist. Informasi), vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 282–301, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.37424/INFORMASI.V16I2.320.
Nindian Puspa Dewi, U. Ubaidi, and U. N. Ismail Moadz, “Combination of AHP and SMART Methods in Determining Recipients of Direct Village Fund Cash Assistance,” Digit. Zo. J. Teknol. Inf. dan Komun., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 13–27, 2023, doi: 10.31849/digitalzone.v14i1.13165.
Tri Aulia Pertiwi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerima Zakat Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting,” Universitas Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, 2022. Accessed: Nov. 28, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://repository.uin-suska.ac.id/id/eprint/58846
S. Sanusi, A. Teja Kusuma, and J. Husna, “Perancangan Sistem Pengambilan Keputusan Penerima Program Bantuan Keluarga Miskin (PBKM) Menggunakan Metode AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process),” J. Teknol. Inf., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 49–56, 2022, doi: 10.35308/jti.v1i2.6216.
P. Hasan, E. Utami, S. Yunita, E. Pawan, and Kaharuddin, “Selection of scholarship acceptance using AHP and TOPSIS methods,” 2019 Int. Conf. Inf. Commun. Technol. ICOIACT 2019, pp. 920–925, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ICOIACT46704.2019.8938533.
L. P. Wanti et al., “A support system for accepting student assistance using analytical hierarchy process and simple additive weighting,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1430, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1430/1/012034.
A. Lia Hananto, B. Priyatna, A. Fauzi, A. Yuniar Rahman, Y. Pangestika, and Tukino, “Analysis of the Best Employee Selection Decision Support System Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP),” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1908, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1908/1/012023.
V. Apriana and S. Fauziah, “Applying Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique (SMART) Method for Employee Performance Assessment,” J. Mantik, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 2759–2769, 2022.
A. Ikhwan and N. Aslami, “Decision Support System Using Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique Method in Determining Eligibility of Assistance,” Build. Informatics, Technol. Sci., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 604–609, 2022, doi: 10.47065/bits.v3i4.1370.
M. Z. Yumarlin, J. E. Bororing, S. Rahayu, and E. Haryanto, “Decision Support System Determining Types of Food Crops Based on Soil Content Using the SMART Method ( Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique) and McCall,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 1030, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1030/1/012009.
P. Aprilio and S. Y. Yuliani, “Implementation of Internship Decision Support System Using Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique (SMART),” 2022 7th Int. Conf. Informatics Comput. ICIC 2022, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ICIC56845.2022.10006995.
M. H. Koto and M. D. Irawan, “Decision Support System for Selecting Rescuer Candidates for Basarnas Special Group Using SMART And BORDA,” JISA(Jurnal Inform. dan Sains), vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 82–90, 2023, doi: 10.31326/jisa.v6i1.1651.
