Comparative Analysis of the Combination of AHP-SAW and AHP-WP in Making Decisions on Hiring New Employees
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57152/ijatis.v2i1.1777Keywords:
Analytic Hirarchy Process, Criteria Weight, Simple Additive Weighting, Weighted Product, Sensitivity TestAbstract
This paper's web-based employee recruitment the goal is to help Human Resource Development (HRD) managers automatically calculate criterion weights and alternative weights, refinement of potential employees and a faster selection process. Recommendation system applications use Combination of Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The AHP method determines the importance of each professional criterion is at the moment. SAW, on the other hand, determines the position or priority of a potential employee, calculated from alternative options. In the AHP method, criteria influence the outcome of a decision. The resulting calculations are examined using the specified priority weights to see which criteria are most important. The weight value for the CI criterion was 0.0603, and the CR value was 0.0538. However, a sensitivity analysis of criterion priorities is required to examine the extent to which small effects on criterion weights change the ranking of alternatives. Based on the ranking results using AHP-WP, Fajar ranked first with a preference value of 0.1037289. You can also see how important the selection criteria are to the ranking results.
References
A. Bagus Primahudi, F. Agustinus Suciono, and A. Aris Widodo, "Decision support system for employee selection using the simple additive weighting method at PT. Indonesian Alwahida Treatment Herbs," JIMP-Jurnal Informatika Merdeka Pasuruan, vol. 2, no. 1, 2016, doi: 10.56327/ijiscs.v4i2.855.
S.W. Julhani and H. Limansyah, "Web-based new employee recruitment using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method," Decision Support Systems with Applications, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 89–99, Sept. 2022, doi: 10.55537/spk.v1i2.155.
P. William Chrisdeardo and W. Kusuma Raharja, "Web-based new employee recruitment selection system at PT Sinar Abadi," doi: 10.32409/jikstik.19.2.2801.
D. Gustian, M. Nurhasanah, and M. Arip, "Employee recruitment selection decision support system using the Analytic Hierarchy Process method," 2019. [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.pcr.ac.id/index.php/jkt/, doi: 10.35143/jkt.v5i2.3336.
N. Vafaei, R.A. Ribeiro, and L.M. Camarinha-Matos, "Assessing normalization techniques for simple additive weighting method," Procedia Computer Science, Elsevier BV, 2021, pp. 1229–1236, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.156.
D. Kurniawati, F.N. Lenti, and R.W. Nugroho, "Implementation of AHP and SAW methods for optimization of decision recommendations," Journal of International Conference Proceedings, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 254–265, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.32535/jicp.v4i1.1152.
G.S. Mahendra and P.G.S.C. Nugraha, "Comparison of AHP-SAW and AHP-WP methods in determining the best e-commerce SPK in Indonesia," Journal of Information Systems and Technology (Justin), vol. 8, no. 4, p. 346, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.26418/justin.v8i4.42611.
N.K.Y. Suartini, D.G.H. Divayana, and L.J.E. Dewi, "Comparison analysis of AHP-SAW, AHP-WP, AHP-TOPSIS methods in private tutor selection," International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 28–45, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.5815/ijmecs.2023.01.03.
R.R. Menon and V. Ravi, "Using AHP-TOPSIS methodologies in the selection of sustainable suppliers in an electronics supply chain," Cleaner Materials, vol. 5, Sept. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.clema.2022.100130.
T.L. Saaty, "Decision making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Scientia Iranica, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 215–229, 2002, doi: 10.1504/ijssci.2008.017590.
D.S. Costa, H.S. Mamede, and M.M. da Silva, "A method for selecting processes for automation with AHP and TOPSIS," Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 3, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13683.
Q. Guo and M. Liu, "Dynamic assessment of eco-civilization in Guangdong Province based on geographic information system (GIS) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP)," Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 12, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22579.
D. Adhikari, K.H. Gazi, B.C. Giri, F. Azizzadeh, and S.P. Mondal, "Empowerment of women in India as different perspectives based on the AHP-TOPSIS inspired multi-criterion decision making method," Results in Control and Optimization, vol. 12, Sept. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.rico.2023.100271.
T. Singh, P. Pattnaik, S.R. Kumar, G. Fekete, G. Dogossy, and L. Lendvai, "Optimization on physicomechanical and wear properties of wood waste filled poly(lactic acid) biocomposites using integrated entropy-simple additive weighting approach," S. Afr J Chem Eng, vol. 41, pp. 193–202, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.sajce.2022.06.008.
T.E. Dameria and Y. Nursyanti, "Determining trucking service providers at PT Yicheng Logistics using the SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) method," APP Jakarta Jl. Arising No, vol. 1, no. 3, p. 1263, 2022, doi: 10.55826/tmit.v1iIII.49.
C. Dewi, "Selection system for poor rice assistance recipients in Kauman Kidul using mobile-based weighted product method," Journal of Informatics Engineering and Information Systems, vol. 4, no. 1, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.28932/jutisi.v4i1.752.
A. Sidiq Purnomo, A. Fauzan Rozi, M. Buana Yogyakarta, J. Jembatan Merah No, and C. Gejayan Yogyakarta, "Comparative analysis uses weighted product (WP) and simple additive weighting (SAW) methods in the best graduation selection system," doi: 10.46984/sebatik.v23i1.442.
I. Komang et al., "Sensitivity analysis of priority criteria in the Analytic hierarchy process method (Case of determining credit grants)," 2022.
L. Jurnal, I. Gede, I. Sudipa, I. Ayu, and D. Puspitayani, "AHP-SAW and ROC-SAW sensitivity analysis in multicriteria decision making," International Journal of Natural Sciences and Engineering, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–9, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/IJNSE, doi: 10.23887/ijnse.v3i2.22229.
J. Wi?ckowski and W. Sa?abun, "Sensitivity analysis approaches in multi-criteria decision analysis: A systematic review," Applied Soft Computing, vol. 148, Elsevier Ltd, Nov. 01, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110915.
