Analisis Komprehensif terhadap Framework dan Alat Penetration Testing: Tren, Tantangan, dan Peluang: Comprehensive Analysis of Penetration Testing Frameworks and Tools: Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities

Mulkan Fadhli

doi:10.57152/ijeere.v4i1.1526

Authors

Mulkan Fadhli UIN Arraniry Aceh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57152/ijeere.v4i1.1526

Keywords:

Penetration Testing, Cyber Security, OSINT, OWASP, Automated Testing

Abstract

The crucial method in cybersecurity aimed at identifying and exploiting vulnerabilities in information systems to enhance security is known as Penetration Testing. The author attempts to present a comprehensive analysis of various penetration testing frameworks and tools, including OWASP, PTES, NIST SP 800-115, OSSTMM, and ISO 27001. Each framework has its distinct advantages and disadvantages, depending on the specific context and needs of the organization. Various penetration testing tools are evaluated based on their ability to detect and exploit vulnerabilities. Recent trends show an increase in the use of automated and AI-based tools to improve efficiency and accuracy. Open-Source Intelligence (OSINT) techniques are also becoming increasingly important in gathering initial information before penetration testing is conducted. However, there are significant challenges in penetration testing, including the complexity of modern systems, resource constraints, evolving threats, regulatory compliance, and the security of the testing tools themselves. These challenges are balanced by significant opportunities in the development of new tools, enhanced collaboration among the security community, increased awareness and investment in cybersecurity, education and training, and integration with DevSecOps methodologies. This article aims to provide in-depth and practical guidance for organizations in selecting and implementing the most suitable penetration testing frameworks and tools according to their needs. With a better understanding of the advantages, disadvantages, trends, challenges, and opportunities in penetration testing, organizations can significantly enhance their security posture..

References

K. U. Sarker, F. Yunus, and A. Deraman, “Penetration Taxonomy: A Systematic Review on the Penetration Process, Framework, Standards, Tools, and Scoring Methods,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 15, no. 13. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI), Jul. 01, 2023. doi: 10.3390/su151310471.

H. M. Adam, Widyawan, and G. D. Putra, “A Review of Penetration Testing Frameworks, Tools, and Application Areas,” in Proceedings - 2023 IEEE 7th International Conference on Information Technology, Information Systems and Electrical Engineering, ICITISEE 2023, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2023, pp. 319–324. doi: 10.1109/ICITISEE58992.2023.10404397.

I. M. Raazi, M. Malahayati, B. Basrul, R. Malia, and M. Fadhli, “Analysis Server Security Assessment of Staffing Management Information System Using the NIST SP 800-115 Method at UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh,” Circuit: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Teknik Elektro, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 46, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.22373/crc.v8i1.20808.

M. Albahar, D. Alansari, and A. Jurcut, “An Empirical Comparison of Pen-Testing Tools for Detecting Web App Vulnerabilities,” Electronics (Basel), vol. 11, no. 19, p. 2991, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.3390/electronics11192991.

A. Shanley and M. N. Johnstone, “Selection of penetration testing methodologies: A comparison and evaluation,” in Australian Information Security Management Conference, AISM 2015, SRI Security Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, 2015, pp. 65–72. doi: 10.4225/75/57b69c4ed938d.

J. Faircloth, “Testing enterprise applications,” in Penetration Tester’s Open Source Toolkit, Elsevier, 2017, pp. 243–271. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-802149-1.00007-5.

J. Faircloth, “Building penetration test labs,” in Penetration Tester’s Open Source Toolkit, Elsevier, 2017, pp. 371–400. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-802149-1.00010-5.

F. Heiding, S. Katsikeas, and R. Lagerström, “Research communities in cyber security vulnerability assessments: A comprehensive literature review,” Comput Sci Rev, vol. 48, p. 100551, May 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.cosrev.2023.100551.

A. K. Sood and R. Enbody, “Why Targeted Cyber Attacks Are Easy to Conduct?,” in Targeted Cyber Attacks, Elsevier, 2014, pp. 113–122. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800604-7.00007-3.

I. D. G. G. Dharmawangsa, G. M. A. Sasmita, and I. P. A. E. Pratama, “Penetration Testing Berbasis OWASP Testing Guide Versi 4.2 (Studi Kasus: X Website),” JITTER?: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi dan Komputer, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 1613, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.24843/JTRTI.2023.v04.i01.p06.

A. A. B. A. Wiradarma and G. M. A. Sasmita, “IT Risk Management Based on ISO 31000 and OWASP Framework using OSINT at the Information Gathering Stage (Case Study: X Company),” International Journal of Computer Network and Information Security, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 17–29, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.5815/ijcnis.2019.12.03.

D. Quick and K.-K. R. Choo, “Digital forensic intelligence: Data subsets and Open Source Intelligence (DFINT+OSINT): A timely and cohesive mix,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 78, pp. 558–567, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.future.2016.12.032.

Comprehensive Analysis of Penetration Testing Frameworks and Tools: Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities