Perbandingan Metode MoSCoW dan AHP dalam Menentukan Kebutuhan Perangkat Lunak di Institusi Pendidikan:  Systematic Literature Review: Comparison of the MoSCoW and AHP Methods in Determining Software Requirements in Educational Institutions: Systematic Literature Review

Elsina Novela Waroi; Nicodemus Rahanra; Brenstein Mawene; Rooy M. Thaniket; Musa Henri Janto Rahanra

doi:10.57152/malcom.v5i4.2230

Authors

Elsina Novela Waroi Universitas Satya Wiyata Mandala
Nicodemus Rahanra Universitas Satya Wiyata Mandala
Brenstein Mawene Universitas Satya Wiyata Mandala
Rooy M. Thaniket Universitas Satya Wiyata Mandala
Musa Henri Janto Rahanra Universitas Satya Wiyata Mandala

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57152/malcom.v5i4.2230

Keywords:

AHP, Kebutuhan Perangkat Lunak, Moscow, Pendidikan, Systematic Literature Review

Abstract

Perangkat lunak berperan penting dalam menunjang kegiatan di institusi pendidikan. Banyaknya pilihan perangkat lunak menuntut adanya metode prioritisasi yang tepat. Penelitian ini membandingkan metode MoSCoW dan Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) dalam menentukan kebutuhan perangkat lunak melalui pendekatan Systematic Literature Review (SLR) terhadap 20 artikel terbitan 2021–2025. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa AHP unggul dalam memberikan pembobotan kuantitatif dan mendukung pengambilan keputusan yang kompleks, sedangkan MoSCoW lebih unggul dalam kemudahan klasifikasi serta mudah dipahami oleh stakeholder non-teknis. Keunggulan penelitian ini terletak pada integrasi kedua metode melalui validasi silang, sehingga menghasilkan prioritisasi kebutuhan perangkat lunak yang tidak hanya praktis, tetapi juga objektif dan siap diimplementasikan. Dengan demikian, penelitian ini berhasil mencapai tujuannya untuk mengevaluasi keunggulan masing-masing metode sekaligus memberikan acuan praktis dalam penetapan prioritas kebutuhan perangkat lunak di institusi pendidikan

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

K. W. Prasetyo and K. Kunci, “Konsep Ontologi pada Manajemen Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak?: Kajian Tentang Perkembangan dan Tantangannya,” pp. 1–9, 2023.

F. Nurzaman, N. Yuliani, I. G. A. Suwartane, D. Gustina, A. Basry, and M. Marnis, “Peningkatan Belajar Perangkat Lunak Microsoft Office untuk Siswa SMP dan Pemanfaatan Teknologi Internet Sebagai Media Belajar,” Media Abdimas, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 8–14, 2023, doi: 10.37817/mediaabdimas.v3i2.2759.

I. H. Putra and N. Salsabila, “Pengelolaan Pengelolaan Kas Pada Program Studi,” no. 456, pp. 1–6.

Arif, “Software Untuk Kuliah Online,” 2023. https://suteki.co.id/software-untuk-kuliah-online/ (accessed Jun. 26, 2025).

A. R. Zuhairunisa, H. M. Az-zahra, and A. Syawli, “Penerapan Metode Moscow dalam Menetapkan Prioritas Kebutuhan Sistem di SMPN 1 Kedawung,” vol. 9, no. 4, 2025.

M. A. Rohmat and Kusrini, “Penerapan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Guru,” Metik J., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 55–62, 2021, doi: 10.47002/metik.v5i1.217.

F. A. Surya, E. Haerani, F. Wulandari, and S. Ramadhani, “Penerapan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Pada Sistem Pengukuran Tingkat Kepuasan Terhadap Kualitas Kinerja Sekolah,” J. Nas. Komputasi dan Teknol. Inf., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 235–242, 2022, doi: 10.32672/jnkti.v5i2.4185.

N. Tou, P. M. Endraswari, and Y. S. R. Nur, “Pemilihan Mahasiswa Berprestasi Menggunakan Algoritma AHP (Studi Kasus: Fakultas Teknik UBB),” JIKA (Jurnal Inform., vol. 7, no. 1, p. 46, 2023, doi: 10.31000/jika.v7i1.7129.

Y. R. Anjani, R. Ningsih, A. J. Wahidin, and T. Pattiasina, “Penggunaan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process untuk Menentukan Model Learning Management System,” J. Fasilkom, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 518–524, 2023, doi: 10.37859/jf.v13i3.5459.

E. Aretoulaki, S. T. Ponis, and G. Plakas, “Requirements Engineering for a Drone-Enabled Integrated Humanitarian Logistics Platform,” Appl. Sci., vol. 14, no. 15, 2024, doi: 10.3390/app14156464.

A. N. Izzati, “Literatur Review: Penerapan Metode Analytic Hierarchy Process Sebagai Teknik Prioritas Kebutuhan Perangkat Lunak,” INTEK J. Inform. dan Teknol. Inf., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 8–18, 2023, doi: 10.37729/intek.v6i2.3729.

A. Maceika, A. Bugajev, O. R. Šostak, and T. Vilutien?, “Decision tree and AHP methods application for projects assessment: a case study,” Sustain. , vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 1–33, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13105502.

S. Kaleem, M. Asim, M. El-Affendi, and M. Babar, “Optimizing Requirements Prioritization for IoT Applications Using Extended Analytical Hierarchical Process and an Advanced Grouping Framework,” Futur. Internet, vol. 16, no. 5, 2024, doi: 10.3390/fi16050160.

N. M. Noorani, A. T. Zamani, M. Alenezi, M. Shameem, and P. Singh, “Factor Prioritization for Effectively Implementing DevOps in Software Development Organizations: A SWOT-AHP Approach,” Axioms, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 1–29, 2022, doi: 10.3390/axioms11100498.

A. Tomczewski, S. Mikulski, and J. Szymenderski, “Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process Method to Select the Final Solution for Multi-Criteria Optimization of the Structure of a Hybrid Generation System with Energy Storage,” Energies, vol. 17, no. 24, 2024, doi: 10.3390/en17246435.

E. J. Yazo-Cabuya, J. A. Herrera-Cuartas, and A. Ibeas, “Organizational Risk Prioritization Using DEMATEL and AHP towards Sustainability,” Sustain., vol. 16, no. 3, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16031080.

M. Z. Mistarihi and G. M. Magableh, “Prioritization of Supply Chain Capabilities Using the FAHP Technique,” Sustain., vol. 15, no. 7, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15076308.

R. Sai, W. Ramdhan, and M. Handayani, “Analytical Hierarchy Process: a method for Determining the Assessment of Soft Skill Competence,” Edumatic J. Pendidik. Inform., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 279–287, 2022, doi: 10.29408/edumatic.v6i2.6371.

Nurhikmah, M. Ropianto, and N. H. Adi, “Intelligent system for college selection with analytical hierarchy process method case study approach,” J. Comput. Instr. Media, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 42–52, 2024, doi: 10.58712/jcim.v2i1.130.

H. Permana and E. Haritman, “Determining priority criteria for using online learning media in Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT) using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method,” Invotec, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 58–66, 2024, doi: 10.17509/invotec.v20i1.67952.

S. Rini, J. Sundari, N. Hardi, and A. Sayfulloh, “Pemilihan Siswa Berprestasi Dengan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (Ahp) Pada Madrasah Aliyah Negeri 16 Jakarta,” vol. 1, pp. 39–45, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://repository.nusamandiri.ac.id/index.php/repo/viewitem/13042

M. Hakim and Rapiun, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Jurusan Pada Smk Negeri 1 Pringgabaya Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy …,” J. Manaj. Inform. dan Sist. …, vol. 7, pp. 62–73, 2024, [Online]. Available: http://e-journal.stmiklombok.ac.id/index.php/misi/article/view/1097%0Ahttps://e-journal.stmiklombok.ac.id/index.php/misi/article/download/1097/296

I. Larasati, A. N. Yusril, and P. Al Zukri, “Systematic Literature Review Analisis Metode Agile Dalam Pengembangan Aplikasi Mobile,” Sistemasi, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 369, 2021, doi: 10.32520/stmsi.v10i2.1237.

J. Pembelajaran, R. Febrianti, W. N. Hidayat, and D. F. Riaji, “Systematic Literature Review?: Faktor Sukses Smart Learning Environment,” vol. 4, no. 7, 2024, doi: 10.17977/um065.v4.i7.2024.20.

V. M. Dinata, A. Wedi, and O. Fajarianto, “Systematic Literature Review?: Implementation of Online Learning Based on Education Levels in Indonesia,” vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1148–1159, 2024.

U. E. Chigbu, S. O. Atiku, and C. C. Du Plessis, “The Science of Literature Reviews: Searching, Identifying, Selecting, and Synthesising,” Publications, vol. 11, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.3390/publications11010002.

M. P. Libório, C. A. P. S. Martins, S. Laudares, and P. I. Ekel, “Method of preparing an international and national literature review for novice researchers,” MethodsX, vol. 10, no. March, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2023.102165.

H. Bibi, A. Raufa, K. Hamid, and H. Bibi, “COMPARATIVE STUDY OF REQUIREMENTS PRIORITIZATION TECHNIQUES,” Contemp. J. Soc. Sci. Rev., vol. 03, 2025, doi: 10.63878/cjssr.v3i3.1099.

R. Pan, M. Bagherzadeh, T. A. Ghaleb, and L. Briand, “Test case selection and prioritization using machine learning: a systematic literature review,” Empir. Softw. Eng., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 1–34, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10664-021-10066-6.

I. M. Siddique, “Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Requirements Prioritization in Complex Adaptive Systems: A Systematic Review and Strategic Research Directions,” Int. J. Artif. Intell. Mech. Eng., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 39–46, 2025, doi: 10.46610/ijaime.2025.v01i01.005.

E. Widarti, M. Erkamim, and W. Wartono, “Big Data in Tourism Destinations: A Systematic Literature Review,” MALCOM Indones. J. Mach. Learn. Comput. Sci., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 719–724, 2024, doi: 10.57152/malcom.v4i3.1263.

S. Vijayakumar, P. K. Krishna, and H. M. Raviraja, “Assessing the Effectiveness of MoSCoW Prioritization in Software Development: A Holistic Analysis across Methodologies,” EAI Endorsed Trans. Internet Things, vol. 10, pp. 1–9, 2024, doi: 10.4108/eetiot.6515.

B. Jamasb, S. R. Khayami, R. Akbari, and R. Taheri, “An Automated Framework for Prioritizing,” pp. 1–24, 2025.